Tuesday, October 25, 2011

The Emergence of Writing in Greek Antiquity

Do you believe that the transition between the days of pre-internet read a book and write a paper, and our current days of fast blue-tooth cord-free and other hyphenated techno-craze has been an easy one?


Do you think it has been entirely in the interest of all people?

Have we lost anything in making this transition?


We have focused a lot in our class about not just the establishment of these various ways of storing knowledge, especially the mediums, but we have also discussed heavily the impact of the changes that come from transitioning between knowledge storing forms.


According to historian and philosopher, Walter J. Ong, "the 'transformation of the word' moved in a sequence of distinct phases from the formulaic style of the poets, to the art of memory practiced by the Sophists, to Plato’s dialogues, and then finally to Aristotle’s descriptive prose treatiseswith Plato, the balance of the tension between the oral and literate mindsets swung in favor of writing."(Epilogue to Plato: The Bias of Literacy---Twyla Gibson; University of Toronto)


Walter J. Ong, along with other scholars, argue that the transition from the completely oral transmission of knowledge to the literary styles preserved even until today from Ancient Greece was not an easy one.  Specifically, the transition from the Sophists oral poetry to Plato's written dialogues seemed to be the most drastic.


Dr. Twyla Gibson, and Assistant Professor at Toronto University and author of Epilogue to Plato: The Bias of Literacy, states:


"Plato was denouncing oral poetry as well as Sophistic oratory and rhetoric because they were representatives of the oral tradition. In contrast, Plato was advocating his own, literate philosophy. Thus, when the balance shifted in favor of literacy in the long transition to the use of letters, Plato was placed on the literate side of the fulcrum."

 The transition from the oral to the literary tradition seems to have taken place at about the time Ancient Greece adopted the Phoenician alphabet in about 500 B.C.  At first, the transition among those willing to make the transition was rather subtle.  Gibson states:
"Plato’s discourses are break boundaries, sites of overlap between two different communication technologies, the oral and the written. Thus, these dialogues are both oral-derived, traditional compositions and works of literate prose philosophy. . .Plato’s dialogues are a hybrid medium, combining oral traditional modes of information storage and retrieval with a consummate literate prose writing style. "
Plato preserved oral forms of memorization (such as chiasmus or metaphors) and translated them to prose.  Overall, Plato made the oral styles of Greek antiquity last longer, even until today.  Imagine what the world would have been like if Plato had never tried to preserve the oral tradition in writing.





Sources: Epilogue to Plato: The Bias of Literacy---Twyla Gibson; University of Toronto.  <http://www.media-ecology.org/publications/MEA_proceedings/v6/Gibson.pdf>.



5 comments:

  1. i feel like we inadvertently preserve styles of one learning system in the transition between systems. the first people to produce written texts DEFINITELY didn't see texts in the same light we see them now - they were just recording the stories as they were heard. i feel like it is an unconscious shift that happens because of the differences between information systems. for instance, there was the story, then the story was written, then certain types of stories were easier/more entertaining to read, so more stories of that nature are produced, until a whole new institution, distinctly different from the original style of orally transmitted stories. (did i hear someone say Darwin?)i think this is evident in the internet age - why do we call it a web PAGE? (as if the whole internet were one great book with really efficient page turning mechanisms)but there are things developing (blogs, for instance, Facebook for another) that could never have developed in a printed, university - based knowledge sharing system. the whole IDEA of a wealth of knowledge that is totally free to anyone is for sure not university-istic!(paid tuition recently?) so where did these come from? why is it that in this new knowledge environment, knowledge-Darwinism has produced what it has produced? does it mean that print and libraries are outdated? possibly (BLASPHEMY!!) what about universities? (well, what about online universities?) i feel like the evolution of knowledge that happens at the turning point brings up ALOT of questions!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember when the internet (world wide web) first came out, we had to "buy minutes" from AOL. So you're right. . .the transition was somewhat reflective of buying a book or an encyclopedia.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It makes me wonder what the next step in preserving knowledge will be. We've already made it to the internet and online archives. Can we go any further? As much as I can't imagine a different system, I also know that the world continues to advance.
    The act of transferring written knowledge has always, to me, been through the use of our hands. In todays world though a variety of machines are able to take down one's audio and transfer it into writing on the computer. Can we even call it writing when it is on the computer though?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Crista, you make a good point. Can we really call what a computer does "writing"? We had to create a new word once typewriters and then computers came out---typing. What's next? As technology changes, we have to crate new words to describe the new developments. Now we can get a hint into how languages change.

    ReplyDelete
  5. i also like crista's comment - i personally have a huge distrust of technology - possibly an effect of watching too many sci-fi movies, but i HATE direct deposit, automatic bill pay, etc. i constantly find myself backing up important files on three or four different "memory" devices because they seem so fallible - what happens if i drop my computer, or if my external hard drive rusts, or if my flash drive gets lost. or if Gmail explodes and all that info is lost.... the "what if" seems to be so compelling to me that i can't trust electronic storage of anything that's really important

    ReplyDelete