Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Common Peloponnesian Sense

Since we have started this class, I have been very interested in how knowledge has been acquired and manipulated in order for one to grow in power.  It would seem like he who knows the most holds the power, hence our allegiance to and dependence on God.  But what else do we know about power? As the  Latter-Day Saint Prophet Joseph Smith wrote in the 121st Section of the Doctrine and Covenants in 1839:

"We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion." (Doctrine and Covenant 121:39)


I did a little research to see how this principle is true in the case of Ancient Greece, the supposed birthplace of democracy.  Using analyses of Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War, I will demonstrate how through the manipulation of social conventions, mainly language and religion, the overarching political and social structures collapse.

As I began my research of this topic, I remembered some of the authors from which my American Heritage course extracted its concepts.  I specifically remember reading Founding Father Tom Paine's famous pro-independence pamphlet Common Sense (1776).  In there, he states:

"Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness;
the former promotes our happiness 
positively by uniting our affections,
the latter 
negatively by restraining our vices.
The one encourages
intercourse, the other creates distinctions."

Society, also know as the polis, according to Tom Paine, is based on the unification of the wants of the people reflected through several conventions, including religion, language, cultural identity, etc.; while government seeks to put controls on said conventions and wants.  Do we often feel like our conventions are being controlled? Have you ever heard of the argument between church and state? What about a debate for a nationally approved and enforced language?  In Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War, several histories are written to portray the epic downfall of the ancient Greek democratic order, destroyed by anarchy in response to the manipulations of power. One analysis of this topic states:

"Even while conventions are artificially constructed out of the need for collective-preservation, its principles are of paramount importance for functionality against the constant tension caused by primary human nature and the lust for power." (http://professornerdster.com/2009/10/15/contemporary-analysis-of-thucydides-history-of-the-peloponnesian-war/)

These conventions, however artificial they may seem, keep a society together.  We have studied as a class the effects of oral language on the transmission of knowledge.  Oral language and other similar conventions are aggregative, conservative, agonistic, and empathetic.  When these social conventions are manipulated, say by law, they become the sources for the anarchy of the society and the downfall of government.  We control these conventions.  These conventions define us.  

How can we best preserve our current social conventions? How does the government seek to control these today? 

2 comments:

  1. Wow. That's pretty cool.

    So, societies tend to embrace a set of values while they form. Then, as the society grows or ages, government is formed to correct the "wrongness" of the side effects of society. In turn, this negative reinforcement apparatus can be used to modulate or direct them, but this tends to alienate the society. This alienation then yields disrespect of governance and thus anarchy. Is that approximately what you were saying?

    I find it interesting that oral and folk tradition are some of the most persistent and powerful teaching tools, and they are most powerfully conveyed filially. Is this part of why we are warned by our prophets against the disintegration of the family unit in America? I think so. Remove or corrupt the most powerful tool in our society for preserving convention, or even just some semblance of homogeneity, and it will lead to discord and anarchy as the society fragments.

    P.s. "agonistic?" Yes, I can Google it, but its usage here smacks of...well...something. I'll go cure my ignorance with a dictionary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. talking about the wants of the people makes me think of the part in the book of Mormon where it talks about if the will of the people comes to choose that which is wrong, they will be destroyed.

    i feel like i got to witness a society in it's process of downfall due to government control on my mission. i was on the french owned island of Guadeloupe, where the majority of the population lives in near servitude to the government. the government controls the education, the majority of the work force, the banks, the medicine, everything except their religion (which was legally separated from any government affiliation after the french revolution). what this equates to is personified in a less active member named brother Andy. his full time government job had him working about 15 hours a week, but if he worked more, he wouldn't get his monthly welfare check (which supplements his disability check, which comes because of the condition which no number of DAYS waiting in line at the hospital can seem to diagnose) so what does andy do with the time that isn't spent at work, waiting in line at the hospital or at the pharmacy or at the bank, he sits in front of the state liquor store with a crowd of other guys whose lives are more or less identical to his - lives that have been controlled - from medicine to education to career - by the government.
    the other side of this, which i don't have space to go into, is another member, brother Eclar. he owns his own business and would be a millionaire if he lived in the states, but the strict government regulation and 65% tax on his businesses income keeps him living a life that would be middle class in the states.

    so, what's the point? (other than a less than subtle opposition to socialism?) the more the people control their language, their education, their identity, the more society thrives. the more the government controls, the more people's life becomes a choice between being dragged along-never really living and definitely never choosing your path, and being crushed - fighting and scraping for every inch, only to have most of it ripped away. and the society VISIBLY suffers - the people, the buildings, the parks, the roads, the everything - looks like it is dragging. and bad.

    ReplyDelete